Legal advice

Alimony for other family members: legal nuances that everyone should know

When we hear the word alimony, we usually immediately think of child support after a divorce. But in Ukrainian legislation, alimony obligations are not limited only to parents and children. Is the son obliged to support the sick mother? Does the grandmother have the right to alimony from the grandson? Is it possible to collect support for an ex-husband or wife if one of them has lost their ability to work? These questions sound strange only at first glance. In fact, they are quite real and legally regulated.

The editors of IA “FAKT” turned to lawyers to find out: who has the right to alimony in a Ukrainian family, what conditions are established by the law, what the procedure for applying to court looks like and in which cases it is possible to terminate the obligation to support a relative. Experts explained what the law actually provides and how to protect your rights in difficult family situations.

Family members are bound together by blood relations, legal seals, and rights and responsibilities. Child support is the first thing a woman thinks about during a divorce. Depriving parents of parental rights who do not care about their own children, women also take care that in the future, in old age, such a father does not come for child support for his own benefit. Therefore, all these duties are well known and citizens actively use the provided opportunities. But the Family Code (SC) of Ukraine contains little-known norms that may come as a surprise to many. It turns out that other family members are bound by the law to maintain alimony obligations.

In accordance with the current legislation, the following obligations are stipulated:

It is the duty of grandmothers and grandfathers to support their grandchildren. Grandparents are obliged to maintain their minor, minor grandchildren if they do not have a mother or father or if the parents cannot provide them with proper support for valid reasons, provided that the grandmother or grandfather can provide financial assistance.

The duty of grandchildren, great-grandchildren to support grandmother, grandfather, great-grandmother, great-grandfather. Adult grandchildren, great-grandchildren are obliged to support disabled grandmother, grandfather, great-grandmother, great-grandfather, who are in need of financial assistance and if they do not have a husband, wife, adult daughter, son, or these persons for good reasons cannot provide them with adequate maintenance, provided that adult grandchildren, great-grandchildren can provide financial assistance.

Duty to support brothers and sisters. Adult brothers and sisters are obliged to support minor, minor brothers and sisters who need financial support and if they do not have parents, husband, wife or these persons cannot provide them with adequate support for good reasons, provided that adult brothers and sisters can provide financial support. Adult brothers and sisters are also obliged to support disabled adult brothers and sisters who need financial assistance, if they do not have a husband, wife, parents or adult daughters, sons, provided that adult brothers and sisters can provide financial assistance.

Duty of stepmother, stepfather to support stepdaughter, stepson. Stepmothers and stepfathers are obliged to support minors, minor stepdaughters, stepsons who live with them, if they do not have a mother, father, grandfather, grandmother, adult brothers and sisters, or these persons cannot provide them with proper maintenance for valid reasons, provided that the stepmother, stepfather can provide financial assistance.

The court can release the stepfather, stepmother from the obligation to support the stepdaughter, stepson or limit it to a certain period, in particular in the case of:

1) short-term residence with their mother, father;

2) inappropriate behavior in the marital relationship of the child’s mother and father.

The duty of other persons to support the child. Persons in whose family a child was brought up are obliged to provide him with financial assistance, if he does not have parents, grandmother, grandfather, adult brothers and sisters, provided that these persons can provide financial assistance.

Duty of stepdaughter, stepson to support stepmother, stepfather. Adult stepdaughters and stepsons are obliged to support disabled stepmothers and stepfathers if they need financial assistance and if they have provided systematic financial assistance to the stepdaughter or stepson for at least five years, provided that the stepdaughter or stepson can provide financial assistance. The duty of a stepdaughter, stepson to maintain a stepmother, stepfather arises if the stepmother, stepfather does not have a husband, wife, adult daughter, son, brothers and sisters, or if these persons cannot provide them with adequate maintenance for valid reasons.

The duty of a person to support those with whom he lived in the same family until reaching the age of majority. If a person lived with relatives or other persons in the same family before reaching the age of majority, he is obliged to support disabled relatives and other persons with whom he lived for at least five years, provided that this person can provide financial assistance. This obligation arises if the person in need of financial assistance does not have a wife, husband, adult daughter, son, brothers and sisters, or these persons cannot provide them with adequate support for valid reasons.

See also  The Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine has again taken up the task of updating the regulations on the certification of pedagogical workers, justifying this step by the need to improve the mechanisms of teacher evaluation. However, despite the promises to improve the educational process, the innovation raises doubts and concerns among many teachers. The impression is that instead of real support and development of the teaching staff, the new certification may become an additional tool of pressure on teachers. Are teachers ready for the new conditions? Will the new rules really contribute to improving the quality of education, or is this another bureaucratic requirement that focuses on formalities, ignoring the essence of pedagogical work? What's new in the regulation on certification of teachers The Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine has updated the Regulation on Attestation of Pedagogical Employees (Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine from 09.09.2022 No. 805, as amended by the Order from 10.09.2024 No. 1277) in order, according to the officials themselves, to improve the mechanism of teacher evaluation. According to the new order, the following changes were made to the regulation: regulated the issue of awarding pedagogical titles and qualification categories to teachers who do not have higher education; It has been determined that teachers who transfer to other educational institutions to work in the same positions or interrupt their work shall retain their pedagogical titles and qualification categories until the next attestation’. The procedure for the establishment of attestation commissions has been improved and the list of entities that may establish them has been defined. In particular, the possibility of establishing attestation commissions by private educational institutions and/or their founders has been envisaged; The awarding of the pedagogical titles ‘senior teacher’, ‘senior teacher’ and ‘senior educator’ has been regulated. They are awarded to teachers who, based on the results of previous attestation, have been assigned (confirmed) a qualification category not lower than ‘second category specialist’ (or the corresponding tariff category has been established) and whose work experience is more than 3 years; the assignment of such pedagogical titles is standardised: ‘teacher-methodist’, ‘teacher-methodist’, ‘educator-methodist’, ‘teacher-organiser-methodist’, ‘practical psychologist-methodist’, ‘circle leader-methodist’, ‘senior counselor-methodist’. They are assigned to teachers who work in the relevant positions and who, according to the results of previous attestation, have a qualification category not lower than ‘specialist of the highest category’ (or the corresponding tariff category is set), higher education and more than 5 years of work experience; It has been determined that level I attestation commissions may be established in educational institutions and separate structural subdivisions with at least 15 pedagogical staff; The issue of attestation of pedagogical workers who have a workload in several academic subjects has been regulated. In addition, not only taking professional development courses, but also receiving education in an institution of higher, professional pre-university education for the next 5 years will be counted as professional development. Also from now on, in case of teaching several subjects, teachers independently choose the sequence of professional development within the total volume of professional development (150 hours or 30 ECTS credits). Also according to the new order, after the certification sheet on the decision of the commission is issued, the head of the educational institution must issue a corresponding order, which is a document confirming the assignment of a qualification category or pedagogical title to a teacher. According to the Ministry of Education and Science, more detailed requirements for teachers' professional activities have now been established, which allows for an objective assessment of their work. teachers are obliged to take regular professional development courses and participate in professional seminars, which contributes to their professional development. the success of students has become an important indicator of the effectiveness of a teacher's work, encouraging teachers to improve teaching methods. more autonomy has also been granted to local attestation commissions, which allows them to take into account the region of the country. What teachers think about the renewal of attestation In turn, teachers themselves note the growth of bureaucratic procedures and the need to spend more time on preparation for such attestation. Indeed, the updated requirements for teachers are becoming more and more stringent every year. Teachers are forced to fulfil a lot of new criteria, submit a lot of documents and undergo complicated inspection procedures. But are these requirements justified? In most cases, they turn into additional bureaucracy that has nothing to do with improving the quality of teaching. On the contrary, teachers spend more and more time on reports rather than on the real development of their students. Here are a few comments indicative of the general mood of educators. "The problem is that the heads of the MES have no profile pedagogical education and none of them has worked in a regular school. That is, the object of management for them is terra incognito. So what adequate management decisions do you want from them?’, - Ihor Likarchuk, former head of the Ukrainian Centre for Education Quality Assessment, commented on the situation. Victoria Kudinova, teacher, Facebook user: ‘And maybe teachers should test the MES, we will also prepare a programme, and a quest 24/7 arrange, and lastly we will certify...’ Yarema Romaniuk, teacher, Facebook user: "Every year they change something. Apparently, the clerks from the Ministry have to show their ‘vigorous’ activity?" Teacher, Facebook user: "Thank you very much. The peddlers of the director and pedagogical councils recognise the courses or not. And people pay money and pass. This is really done for people!" Larisa Kotlyarenko, Facebook user: ‘The only + that can become and - it is the awarding of the highest category and titles in their own collective.’ However, the most painful remains another thing - despite the new requirements, the attitude to the teacher as a key figure of society has not changed. The teaching profession, which should be one of the most prestigious in the country, is still undervalued. Teachers, who are expected to deliver high results and innovative approaches to their work, continue to receive meagre salaries, often lacking even the basic resources for quality teaching. With conditions like these, it is not surprising that more and more teachers are leaving the profession. Miserable salaries, constant demands, and lack of support from the authorities - all of this makes even the most dedicated teachers consider changing careers. When the state does not value its teachers, it loses not only its personnel but also its future. After all, without competent and motivated teachers, Ukrainian education is sinking into the abyss. The paradox is that the Ministry of Education and Science constantly puts forward new requirements for the certification of teachers, but who protests the very officials who come up with ridiculous reforms? Have any of them worked in a school under real conditions? Do they realise what they demand from a teacher who, apart from the educational process, still has to solve a bunch of social problems of his students and work without proper support? The main question is: to what extent are the new certification rules really necessary? The MES does not offer concrete solutions on how to improve the working conditions of teachers or increase their motivation. Instead, attestation becomes a kind of test that a teacher has to pass every five years. But instead of supporting and developing specialists, certification turns into an additional stress factor. The new criteria do not take into account the real problems of the educational process: the decreasing number of students in classes, insufficient funding for schools, outdated teaching materials. What will happen to education in such conditions in a few years? If the trend with the outflow of teachers continues, Ukrainian schools will simply have no one to teach our children. Ukrainian education is on the threshold of dangerous changes. If the Ministry of Education and Science does not change its attitude to teachers, and the state does not recognise the importance of decent pay and working conditions for teachers, we risk losing a whole generation of quality specialists. After all, when teachers leave, it is not only empty seats in schools. The future of the country is left without support. It is time to recognise that reforms in education should start not with new requirements, but with care for those who work for children every day. Teachers deserve decent salaries, respect and real support, not another bureaucratic burden. Otherwise, attestation, which is supposed to assess professionalism, will turn into another tool of pressure that will get to those who have not yet broken down. How the process of attestation of pedagogical workers has changed Attestation of teaching staff in Ukraine has a long history, which changed in accordance with the social, political and economic conditions of the country. Over time, the process has been transformed, but its main shortcomings have remained unchanged: increasing demands on teachers without appropriate support and incentives. Let's take a look at how attestation was carried out in the past, what has changed now and how it has affected teachers. In Soviet times, attestation of teaching staff in Ukraine was a formal procedure that was aimed at ensuring that teachers met the requirements of the state education system. Attestation was based on clearly defined standards that had little to do with the actual skills and abilities of teachers. Evaluation was done more to maintain the image of the system than to improve the quality of education. The certification process was fully controlled by the state authorities. Teachers had to undergo compulsory certification at certain intervals. Attestation took place once every five years and teachers received qualification categories that affected their salaries and status in the education system. Although a system of professional development existed, it was more nominal. Most teachers took professional development courses only to fulfil formal requirements. After independence, Ukraine retained many features of the Soviet attestation system but tried to introduce certain changes over time. Until the latest changes, the attestation system remained bureaucratic. As before, attestation was carried out every five years. The main purpose was to confirm teachers' qualification categories. Teachers were evaluated by a special attestation commission, which consisted of school administration, trade union representatives and local education authorities. The assessment was based on teacher's work reports, analyses of lessons attended and documents confirming participation in seminars and professional development courses. Attestation was related to the assignment of qualification categories (specialist, specialist of the second, first and highest categories). A teacher's salary depended on the category. The process remained formal and often did not correspond to the real quality of teachers' work. Bureaucratisation and lack of funding prevented the creation of a real motivation system for teachers. Teachers were often required to report and participate in seminars without real changes in the teaching process. In 2023, the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine announced new changes to the Regulation on Attestation of Pedagogical Employees. The changes are aimed at improving the quality of education and simplifying the attestation process, but for many teachers they have become an additional burden. The new requirements have added even more burden to the routine work of teachers. Teachers now have to fulfil a greater number of criteria concerning both professional achievements and the use of modern technologies in teaching. An important component of the new system has been the assessment of pupils' progress. This has caused much discussion, as success depends on many factors that the teacher cannot always influence (social status of the family, material and technical support of the school, etc.). Teachers are now required to take regular refresher courses and participate in professional seminars. While this could be a positive aspect, many teachers note that they are forced to take these courses formally, with no real opportunity to put the knowledge into practice. Attestation commissions now have more autonomy, but this has also led to differences in approaches to attestation in different regions. With the increase in the number of criteria for certification, teachers are under more pressure. Many teachers complain that they have to spend more time preparing for certification than actually teaching. The constant pressure to meet new requirements and ensure high student results leads to stress and emotional burnout. Teachers note that the bureaucratic approach to assessing their work creates additional difficulties instead of support. Despite the new requirements, the financial situation for most teachers has not improved. Salaries remain low and additional responsibilities and requirements are not accompanied by appropriate financial incentives. Due to the increasing workload and lack of adequate conditions, many teachers are leaving the profession. This process only exacerbates the shortage of qualified teachers in Ukrainian schools. It is obvious that despite attempts to update the system of certification of teaching staff in Ukraine, most of the changes do not address the main problems, such as low salaries, insufficient support from the state and excessive bureaucratisation. The state should realise that in order to improve the situation it is necessary not only to introduce new criteria, but also to provide real support for teachers, in particular financial support, and to create conditions for their professional development that would meet modern requirements. Attestation of teaching staff abroad Attestation of teaching staff in foreign countries differs significantly from the Ukrainian system and can serve as an example for the introduction of more effective approaches to the assessment of teachers' professional performance. For example, in Finland, which is known for its high-quality education system, teacher certification is practically absent in the usual sense. In Finland, the emphasis is on teacher training and professional autonomy. Teachers receive a high level of academic training while they are still in higher education, as a master's degree is compulsory. However, teachers regularly participate in continuing education and professional development. At the same time, there is no formal appraisal system, but rather student learning outcomes are assessed. In turn, continuous professional development is voluntary and at the same time strongly encouraged by the state. In the US, teacher certification is regulated at the state level, so systems may vary. In general, however, the process involves: Regular reviews and evaluations. Administrators or head teachers observe lessons and evaluate teaching skills and ability to work with students. Professional development. teachers have the opportunity to take professional development courses. Many states require teachers to obtain certificates or licences to prove their knowledge and skills. Evaluation based on student performance. in some states, student performance on standardised tests is an important part of certification. This is controversial because student performance depends on many factors. Canada uses teacher evaluation systems similar to those in the United States, but with certain features. In some provinces, teachers must undergo regular observations and evaluations at different stages of their careers. For example, novice teachers undergo frequent examinations and supervision to test their ability to handle the classroom. Teachers must also undergo periodic professional development courses. As in the US, student results also affect teacher appraisals. In the UK, teacher certification is done through a system known as OFSTED (Office for Standards in Education), the national regulator of educational quality. Appraisal takes place through supervision and inspections, during which lessons are examined. Supervisors can come to lessons unannounced to assess a teacher's professionalism. Great emphasis is placed on pupils' results, progress and level of knowledge. Teachers are required to participate in professional development programmes and this is also taken into account in the appraisal process. Singapore, one of the countries with the most successful education systems, has introduced a comprehensive system of teacher appraisal and professional development. All teachers are required to undergo stages of regular performance evaluation based on the following criteria: performance evaluation - includes lesson observation, teacher self-assessment and student surveys; learning outcomes - student progress plays an important role; professional development - teachers should participate in continuous professional learning programmes, which are also taken into account in the evaluation. As we can see, foreign teacher appraisal systems show that the effectiveness of appraisal often depends on teachers' professional development, autonomy and support system. In many countries, teachers do not experience excessive pressure of bureaucracy, and the process of evaluation of their work is more aimed at helping them develop professional skills rather than punishing them. So, Ukrainian education is on the edge of the abyss, and the next innovations of the Ministry of Education and Science are only bringing it closer to disaster. The new certification requirements have become an additional burden on teachers who are exhausted by bureaucracy, low salaries and lack of real support. Instead of improving the working conditions of teachers, we see a mass exodus of professionals from a system that exhausts them. The question is, who will stand in front of the classroom tomorrow when today's teachers leave the profession? Unless we stop this process and offer real changes - higher salaries, less bureaucracy, support for professional development - Ukrainian education risks being left without those who create it. Famous personalities have long spoken about what a society without education is like, so it would be useful for officials from the MES to listen to them: "Without education, nations quickly turn into obedient slaves ’ - Jean-Jacques Rousseau. "A society that does not invest in education prepares the ground for its own decline ’ - Heinrich Heine. ‘Without education, society is a mob, easier to manipulate than to develop’- William Dubois. "A people deprived of education is like a man without eyes ’ - Konstantin Ushinsky. "Education is the most powerful weapon that can be used to change the world. Without it, the world will remain in the chains of ignorance.’ - Nelson Mandela. "The darkness of ignorance feeds all forms of evil, and lack of education feeds the darkness ’ - Thomas Jefferson. ‘Without education, society lives for today without building a future for itself ’ - John Dewey. "Education is the guardian of liberty. Without it, society will be confined to a framework of blind obedience ‘ - George Washington.

Based on the above, alimony can be collected from almost any family member! Analysis of court practice shows that there are very few decisions on the collection of such alimony compared to “classic” options. Considering the standard of living of the majority of the population, it is not that there are no people who would be hindered by extra funds, but that citizens do not know about their rights and the mechanisms for their implementation.

The amount of alimony collected from other family members and relatives for children and disabled adults in need of financial assistance is determined as a share of earnings (income) or in a fixed monetary amount. Here, as we can see, the same approach is used as for child support.

When determining the amount of alimony, the court takes into account the financial and family status of the payer and recipient of alimony. But the main thing that distinguishes this from alimony is that if the lawsuit is not brought against all obligated persons, but only against some of them, the amount of alimony is determined taking into account the obligation of all obligated persons to provide maintenance. At the same time, the total amount of alimony payable per child must be necessary and sufficient to ensure the harmonious development of the child and cannot be less than 50 percent of the subsistence minimum for a child of the appropriate age. Therefore, the court must find out which other relatives there are, what their financial and health status is, and to what extent they are able to pay alimony for the maintenance of a child or another family member. Let’s immediately note that there is no single database that would definitely give out the entire family tree. Having certain data, it is possible to poke around the registers of the RATS for quite a long time and find something. But the court is not connected to the RAC registers, will not check them, and therefore sometimes it makes sense to keep quiet about the presence of certain relatives in the court.

The minimum recommended total amount of alimony payable from other family members and relatives per child is the subsistence minimum for a child of the appropriate age and may be awarded by the court in case of sufficient earnings (income) of the alimony payer.

The Government of Ukraine has established the following levels of the subsistence minimum for 2025 for children:

  • up to 6 years – UAH 2,563
  • from 6 to 18 years – UAH 3,196.

The court can collect alimony both indefinitely, and specify a certain period for which alimony is collected: when the child reaches the age of majority, three years, etc.

Note that a change in the amount of alimony from other family members and relatives and exemption from their payment is provided for in the following cases (non-exhaustive list):

  • if the financial or family status of the person paying alimony or the person receiving it has changed, the court may change the established amount of alimony or exempt it from payment at the request of any of them;
  • in the presence of other significant circumstances. This item does not apply to grandchildren, great-grandchildren as far as grandmother, grandfather, great-grandmother, great-grandfather is concerned.

Therefore, the court will carefully consider each individual alimony claim, deciding how much this or that person is obliged to support another family member and in what amount.

It should also be noted that there is a choice for submitting a claim to the court regarding the collection of alimony – such a claim can be filed as a choice:

  • at the registered place of residence of the plaintiff;
  • at the defendant’s registered place of residence.

When preparing for this case, you should understand certain difficulties that you will have to face. The fact is that the court needs to provide a complete package of documents, which must necessarily include a family/family relationship. Partially different birth, marriage, etc. certificates are usually available. But we are also talking about other family members, the documents on which, of course, will not be available to the plaintiff. In this case, the person must apply in writing to the RAC department and, indicating the maximum known (or tentatively known) dates, ask to provide extracts from official records of birth, marriage, divorce, etc.

See also  Military vehicles in residential yards: what you need to know to avoid conflicts

If according to the law it is possible to issue a relevant extract, the RACS department will do so. If the act record is available, but you do not have the right to receive an extract from it, then together with the claim, you will need to submit a petition for the demand of evidence to the court, with which you will ask the court to demand from the RATS department the corresponding extract from the act record, which you will need to prove the family relationship.

If, for any reason, the required act record is not available at all (destroyed, lost, it is not known where to look for it at all), and you cannot confirm your family relationship with documents in any way, then at the same time, in the claim for the recovery of alimony, you must make a demand to establish the fact of family relations, for example: to establish the fact that Natalya Maksimivna Petrenko is the sister of Pyotr Ivanovych Sydorenko. In such a case, in addition to the evidence related to the demand for the recovery of alimony, it is necessary to provide the maximum available evidence that would confirm the marital status, including a request for the court to interrogate witnesses.

According to Art. 5 of the Law of Ukraine “On Court Fees” plaintiffs are exempted from payment of the court fee in a claim for the collection of alimony. But if the second requirement is to establish the fact of family relations, then the court fee will amount to UAH 605.60

If the person from whom alimony has been collected refuses to pay it voluntarily, it is necessary to obtain an executive letter from the court and submit it to the executive service for implementation. In the future, the same procedure applies to the collection of alimony as for “classic” ones.

It is worth knowing that alimony can be collected under the writ of execution for the past time, but not more than ten years preceding the presentation of the writ of execution for execution. If alimony was not charged according to the enforcement letter presented for execution in connection with the search for the alimony payer or in connection with his stay abroad, they must be paid for the entire past time.

Arrears for alimony awarded as a share of earnings (income) are determined based on the actual earnings (income) received by the payer of alimony during the time during which their collection was not carried out, regardless of whether such earnings (income) were received in Ukraine or abroad. The alimony arrears of the alimony payer who did not work at the time of the arrears or who is an individual entrepreneur and is on the simplified taxation system, or who is a citizen of Ukraine who receives earnings (income) in a state with which Ukraine does not have a legal aid agreement, is determined based on the average salary of an employee for a given area.

At the same time, in case of arrears due to the fault of a person who is obliged to pay alimony by a court decision or by agreement between the parents, the recipient of alimony has the right to collect a penalty (penalty) in the amount of one percent of the amount of unpaid alimony for each day of delay from the day the alimony payment is overdue until the day of its full repayment or until the day the court passes a decision on the collection of a penalty, but not more than 100 percent debts The amount of the penalty may be reduced by the court, taking into account the financial and family status of the alimony payer.

Taking into account the financial and family status of the alimony payer, the court may delay or postpone the payment of alimony arrears. At the request of the payer of alimony, the court may fully or partially release him from the payment of alimony arrears, if it arose in connection with his serious illness or another circumstance of significant importance.

In general, we advise you to actively use the opportunities provided by law, because nothing strengthens a family like money invested in it.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Back to top button